Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pascal Mubenga

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pascal Mubenga

Pascal Mubenga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject, unsourced BLP, and reads like a puff piece. Meatsgains(talk) 02:26, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment It has a source in the External links section, from which the creator copy-pasted the vast majority of the text, which is something worth checking before nominating to AfD.
    talk) 02:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 21:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete - nn --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Being superintendent of a single city's local school board is not an automatic inclusion freebie under
    WP:NPOL — it might get a person into Wikipedia on the vanishingly rare occasion that they could be referenced well enough (i.e. nationalizing coverage) to make them a special case over and above most other school superintendents, but nothing remotely like that is being demonstrated here. Bearcat (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.