Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passage (2009 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Article has been improved and nominator has withdrawn. Being a discusssion which has not seen any traffic, and thus no outstanding deletion votes, I am

closing this AFD Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Passage (2009 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no reliable sources covering this short film. The article is currently referenced to a press release. Fails

WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 05:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 09:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 09:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (state the obvious) @ 09:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: Sometimes there are news articles linked to a film's page at IMDB. Through it I found a few which speak positively toward the film and the filmmakers, including [1] [2]. The official website seems to indicate there is German-language coverage.[3] and so I choose to await input from Wikipedians able to search for and offer additional non-English coverage, as we have a possibly addressable issue of an article simply needing better souring. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

talk) 02:51, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per meeting
WP:GNG. While the nominated version had issues, these have been addressed to serve the project and its readers. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- This is now Withdrawn. SL93 (talk) 21:36, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.