Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patti Dunn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Patti Dunn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources here are almost all local coverage fluff articles from the Atlanta newspaper. I think to argue that Dunn is important we would either need coverage that is fully about just Dunn and not in light of beauty pageant competition, or coverage of a significant nature that comes from outside of metro-Atlanta. I could find neither. John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 02:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 02:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment Why? There is no reason the coverage cannot be local for a biography, as long as the sources are reliable. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect: I agree with Megalibrarygirl because Atlanta Journal is considered a reliable source. According to the lead there is no notability "...competed in the Miss USA pageant and has held a number of other pageantry titles.", but apparently the subject (in the body) won Miss Georgia USA 2000 and placed 4th in the Miss USA 2000. I disagree that just winning Miss Georgia USA and taking part in a TV reality episode gives notability for an article. Otr500 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Atlanta coverage is a major metro area, that's adequate to meet "significant". There is some debate over whether just winning a state pageant confers notability, but she's gone a bit farther than that, she's at least a B-list tabloid semi-celebrity. Montanabw^(talk) 22:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable pageant contestant. Sources are weak with The Atlanta Journal covering the subject because it was her hometown as I understand. Nothing more than "local person gets award". K.e.coffman (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: Would we say the same if a Miss New York was covered in the New York Times? Montanabw^(talk) 20:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be the same situation: "local person gets award". If would be different if NYT covered, say, Miss Oregon. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:21, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find that unpersuasive. Atlanta is a major metro area, the major papers don't waste time on Little League. Montanabw^(talk) 08:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.