Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Love World

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Love World

Peace Love World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Peace Love World does not appear to be notable. The company does have news from notable publications but seems to lack in-depth coverage. The article was also stripped down in the past and is now extremely short. The World's Signature (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
    Talk to my owner:Online 03:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
{talk} 04:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
{talk} 04:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
talk) 18:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Strong G11 (if not also A7) case. Very little notability beyond scraps (properly notable fashion retailers throw up lots of strong RS given their business). Britishfinance (talk) 01:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete Article is skimpy and lacks sources that establish notability.TH1980 (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.