Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peculiar Chris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK1: nomination withdrawn and no deletion arguments czar 00:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peculiar Chris

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing that shows this book is notable and the author doesn't have an article. Fails

WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 01:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. GBooks search indicates that the book seems to have attracted a typical amount of review coverage when it came out, to be recognized as significant by later scholarship, and to be discussed at length in some scholarly sources eg. [1] –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:47, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm willing to withdraw this per that book and sources that I found for the stage play today. I just don't know how to close an AfD. SL93 (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.