Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer Baba
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Pir (Sufism). MBisanz talk 00:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Peer Baba
Just a dictionary definition. See
]- Transwiki - Belongs at Wiktionary after some cleanup. That is, if anyone finds any references for it. If none can be found, then it's a slam-dunk Speedy Delete. Lukeno94 (talk) 15:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think any WP:Criteria for speedy deletion apply in this case. On the other hand, it does appear to be a word definition, possibly covering the same concept at Pir (Sufism), though I'm not sure about that based on current content. In that case, the page should be
deletedvia this AfD process. Cnilep (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Merge to Pir (Sufism). Further investigation makes me more certain that these are the same concept. Some Sufi saints in South Asia are alternately called pir or baba, such as Nau Gaja Pir, a.k.a. Sain Syali Baba. Cnilep (talk) 03:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Pir (Sufism). --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Huntley 02:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as Redtigerxyz said! --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Are there any sources for either of these terms? -- Trevj (talk) 10:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.