Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry Swenson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perry Swenson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable and improvable as basically the best I found was this, this, this, this and this and this hasn't changed much since February 2008. Pinging Tewapack and Wisdom89. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment LinkedIn profile https://www.linkedin.com/pub/perry-swenson/19/4b0/680 indicates that she was a professional golfer from 2005 to 2011 and is now in insurance. Whether she achieved enough as a golfer to be notable is unclear to me. Nigej (talk) 11:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @

WP:RS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Fails

WP:NGOLF and is an orphan article. Tewapack (talk) 15:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails

WP:NGOLF....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.