Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Freeman (musician)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz talk 14:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Freeman (musician)

Peter Freeman (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Only got attention for his work on the album The Vertical Collection with Jon Hassell. There are no RS in the article: only the two interviews give any biographical informations, and they almost all come from his own month. One of the interviews is done alongside Hassell. The other interview is in a non-notable publication and notes that his work with Hassell as his main contribution to the musical world. The interviewer also says she spoke to Freeman before, for an article on Hassel's work. That article doesn't mention Freeman at all.

Freeman died six month ago, but I didn't find this being reported in any RS. You can only see his death being reported on content farm websites.

Mottezen (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
Mottezen (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
Mottezen (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
Mottezen (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
Mottezen (talk) 06:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I agree with the nomination this guy really has not made any significant contribution to music. He does not have any awards or anything. Does not pass

WP:GNG
--
Rrmmll22 (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve I disagree with both the proposer and the first response above. The history of early electronic music and the people who contributed to it is not very well documented, but the scope of Freeman's contributions shown in the filmography is both impressive and interesting. It is easy for some Wikipedians to say "non-notable" and simply scrapping this on the basis of "I couldn't find any sources so there must be none" for a new article is one of the banes of the Wikipedia. This isn't a vanity article; the subject is dead. The proposer asserts that a publication is "non-notable" but that again is just an assertion. Yes, the article needs more citations. The right thing to do is to flag the article for improvement, not for summery deletion. -- Evertype· 19:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve per Evertype above. To declare my

WP:RS you can find via Google. Anyways, I've said too much - Alison 00:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep and improve as per Evertype, it seems a disservice to a niche topic area and someone who from their discography and collaborations was high profile/prolific in their music genre to just slap a deletion tag on it. His name makes searching efficiently online slightly challenging without doing more serious amounts of due diligence. Smirkybec (talk) 10:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve as per Evertype and Smirkybec, et al. Niche musicians may not get the kind of traditional coverage that mainstream musicians get but that doesn't diminish their contributions and so we need to broaden our definition of what is a reliable source to accommodate this - in 2021, blogs by notable commentators have to be looked at differently than how we looked at blogs ten years ago. Yes, let's try to improve this piece with more and "better" sources, but deleting it is utterly uncalled for. Tvoz/talk 21:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.