Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Frishauf

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No comments, I'm treating this as a PROD/SOFTDELETE. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 19:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Frishauf

Peter Frishauf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, seems to serve as a vanity project for the subject as well as a CV and as a repository for external links for business interests.

(NB: Subject of article is also a Wikipedian who has made only one relatively innocuous edit to this page 12 years ago, so this is not about a conflict of interest there.) JesseRafe (talk) 21:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Help! 01:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.