Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pikaba.com

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:18, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pikaba.com

Pikaba.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

created for high degree of promotions, nothing else! Light2021 (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete blatantly promotional. If you check the PR-like description in the intro, you'll see even the source says it's a quote from the CEO. Several of the sources are not in fact verifiable. Basic
    WP:BEFORE doesn't show me anything, though it also brings up hits on people's names and the word "pikaba" itself - David Gerard (talk) 10:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete as spam; 'nuff said. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.