Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirouline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yummy! :) -

Pirouline

A consensus was reached at DRV to overturn the speedy deletion of this article [1]. This is a procedural nomination so I abstain. Thryduulf 15:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a perfectly valid and harmless article about a real subject. Having it certainly does not go against Wikipedia's mission, and in no way constitutes spam. Turnstep 15:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Turnstep. --
  Aaron 16:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Abstain Do we anticipate a separate article on every cookie/biscuit from every manufacturer? If this one is unique or otherwise notable, keep it. If it isn't, delete it. Not being in America, I've never heard of it or the company, so cannot comment on its notability or lack thereof. Emeraude 16:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - per above - AfDs are getting ridiculous! PT ^(s-s-s-s) 20:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. Meets the requirements for product notability. Original speedy was nonsense.Cynical 22:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No reason to delete this. - Lex 18:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Yum! Grindingteeth 15:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Is it really that notable?--150.203.177.218 05:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.