Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayStation Wrestling
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete.
]PlayStation Wrestling
- PlayStation Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
verifiable. Infobox seems to be based on the one of Panda Energy International. Website looks like a crude hoax. Anthem 19:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As the nominating user proved to be a sockpuppet. No apparent reason anyway for deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - It's a hoax. The "references" in the article have nothing to do with the topic. There's no news in any of the named personnel's wiki articles or on the internet via google. The supposed website of this supposed professional organization affiliated with well-known names of current and former wrestling celebrities looks like it was made in 1995 by a 13-year-old. The wikilinks to "PSW Championship" goes to the WWE Championship. The originator goes by the name "Sock48", for booting up cold. Do you need more reasons? - Salamurai (talk) 16:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. References don't verify the article, and there aren't even any Google hits for "PlayStation Wresting" AND "Chris McMahon". The nominator being a sockpuppet of an indef blocked user is a pity, but speedy keep isn't an option now. Fences&Windows 11:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.