Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plaza Hotel, College Station

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plaza Hotel, College Station

Plaza Hotel, College Station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet

WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings.   // Timothy :: talk  23:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Run-of-the mill hotel, lacking any real notability beyond the local level.TH1980 (talk) 04:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no indication of historic significance Spiderone 10:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This probably almost meets
    WP:GNG already, but I can't quite tell: a couple of the KBTX links are broken, I can't access The Eagle since that website is geoblocked. However, this was the first major hotel capable of handling conventions built in College Station, and while the archives I have access to don't cover the construction of the 17-storey high rise, the hotel received significant coverage during its construction: [1] [2] [3], noting how the building alone was the reason for a spike in building permit revenue [4] along with coverage of its sale out of bankruptcy court: [5] And its construction was even important enough to be blurbed about far away from College Station: [6]. That's just the construction alone, an implosion tends to generate GNG-calibre coverage as well and so I think this is an easy pass. SportingFlyer T·C 18:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per nom,
    Coverage was local. How is that notable in any way? Bearian (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Well, let's see - the building passes
    WP:MILL here, but just being locally notable isn't a reason for deletion - I've finished a couple articles on hotels recently where the only major coverage was local, but the buildings are still important enough to warrant an article. I think this hotel also clearly qualifies - I think everyone is assuming that it's some no-name branded hotel by the side of the road, but it's not. SportingFlyer T·C 22:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep I found the article and topic interesting and well-supported by sources. I am with SportingFlyer on enough notability, and simply think the article adds value to the encyclopedia.--Concertmusic (talk) 20:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.