Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poonja Jinnah

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC) P.S. Since this was the third time the article was deleted, I also salted the title. --MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poonja Jinnah

Poonja Jinnah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Delete. Notable why? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -Not notable. ABF99 (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. It's not hard to find sources about Jinnahbai Poonja, although most of them discuss him only in the context of his children. As already observed, notability is not inherited. That said, there is some more detailed coverage available. Salman Akhtar spends a page or so discussing him. And there are paragraph bits about his business dealings and religious background in other sources. I'm not convinced that's enough to hang an article on. In any case, it wouldn't be this article, which is a cursory mention cited to unreliable sources. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete G5. Created by two sockpuppets of indefinitely blocked
    talk) 15:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.