Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postwar Positioning of Kosovo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Postwar Positioning of Kosovo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTALBALL. Reads like an opinion article. Article was proded but prod was taken down. ...William 17:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the |list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions....William 21:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Delete per nom. This seems to be a research essay possibly written for a class. It is a remarkably good one, but it is not encyclopedic in style, and it would take a substantial amount of editing to make it meet the standards of Wikipedia. Go ahead and delete it. If someone wants to incorporate material from it into the Kosovo article, I would not necessarily be opposed to merging. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, interesting, but not an encyclopædia article. No objection to userification if the author wants to post it elsewhere. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.