Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priceless (Birdman Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Priceless (Birdman Album)

Priceless (Birdman Album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-sourced crystal ballism; violates

• Delete.
  WP:Crystal Niteshift36 (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Strong delete per
  WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SLOBBERINGFANBOY. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because all three sentences are
  WP:CRYSTAL. The page would have to be blanked to salvage anything, and then only another forward-looking statement would be possible. ZabMilenko 08:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment - additional information has been added, but none of it has been sourced; as a result, it remains (IMO) a violation of
  WP:CRYSTAL, and still should be deleted. --mhking (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete agree with above fails
  WP:CRYSTAL. BigDunc^Talk 14:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - per
  WP:CRYSTAL. Rlendog (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.