Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince of Cambridge
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to ]
Prince of Cambridge
No such title exists. The baby is "Prince George of Cambridge", but not "George, Prince of Cambridge". Hence the article is ridiculously wrong. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This page was a redirect to Prince George of Cambridge until one editor insisted on creating an article about the supposed title. Restoring the redirect makes sense for now. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect back to Prince George of Cambridge. Whilst historically there has been at least one other "Prince of Cambridge", Prince George is currently the most notable, and anyone searching for Prince George, Duke of Cambridge can follow the link from the top of the article for the current prince.Martin451 (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Prince George of Cambridge. Though technically incorrect, this is an entirely plausible search term so we should give it a useful use, as it were! The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.