Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Print Conductor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Print Conductor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to be a non-notable free software product. The article provides no indication of significance. Salimfadhley (talk) 13:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up only this pc advisor review, no other significant RS coverage, and not enough to establish notability. Dialectric (talk) 10:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Like Dialectric I cannot find any sources that help the subject meet notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.