Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Shah the matchmaker
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Priya Shah the matchmaker
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Priya Shah the matchmaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company doesn't seem to meet
WP:NCORP - coverage is largely based on press-releases or interviews. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
]
- Good Coverage from the sources. there are many other similar articles existing in Wikipedia with less or equal coverage Mokshalini (talk) 11:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the Forbes India piece says it's not written by Forbes, so it's advertising. The rest are basically as bad... This is promo. Oaktree b (talk) 13:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Sexuality and gender, and India. Skynxnex (talk) 17:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: An article about a company, moved from draft to mainspace on the 13th edit by the article creator. This article's text is supported by PR coverage plus a news report on a consumer complaint finding against the company. The 2021 BrandMedia item lists various awards to the company founder but none looks notable in itself, and I am not seeing ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.