Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Process management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Business process management. If at some point someone decides there's enough to write an article which isn't essentially duplicating the content of the merge target, feel free to do so, but for now I don't think that will be the case. ansh 666 05:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Process management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy on

Content Forking. The contents presented in this article is treating the same subject as business process management

.

Another consideration can be making a redirect to the page business process management. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaleBlueDot1 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge any useful content to Business process management and then redirect, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page has existed since 2003. Process management is a wider concept than BPM because processes occur in other fields besides business. There are plenty of books which refer to it by this title and so it is notable by this name. Per our
editing policy, we should retain the page for further development and improvement. Andrew D. (talk) 22:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge and then redirect The long existence of the page has not yielded any distinct or useful content. The contents of this page are defining the same area as Business process management. The first line on this page refers to business processes. The publications referring to it by this title are referring to business process management, including the most widely cited publications on Google Books and Scholar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaleBlueDot1 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the 2 concepts are sufficiently tied to be merged. L3X1 (distænt write) 13:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.