Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prominence (2015 video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails

Note: This debate has been included in the

t@lk to M£ 06:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

t@lk to M£ 06:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. Zeneater (talk) 11:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Tentative keep - I already see coverage in reliable sources being used in refs (at least from PCGamer), and there's not reason to believe this won't get more coverage and reviews once released later this week. ☺ · 
  ✉ 16:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - Prominence was community-voted to be
  Gamasutra sister-site). Also recently on some smaller sites.^[3][4] There are older references, such as a 2007 Engadget^[5] and several for their 2013 Greenlight blitz, some including demo reviews (Google translations given when possible).^{[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]}. A preview article also appeared in print in issue 283 of a French 2013 gaming magazine, Canard PC.^[18][19] (NOTE: I'm the Wiki article creator and got many references from the Prominence Facebook page) Zeneater (talk) 17:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - The successful greenlit game seems a measure of notability to consider. See: "FAQ: How many votes does a game need to get selected?" If additional notability beyond what is already cited is required, it is reasonable to expect more articles and reviews will surface once the game is released to the public. Ratsiva (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.