Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-Latvian language
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete, may be redirected or merged at editors' discretion, if there's consensus. Sandstein (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proto-Latvian language
- )
I have strong doubts about this article, because Lithuanian language is older than Latvian. --Visconsus (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Text copied from article talk page. ➨ REDVEЯS knows it's gonna happen someday 21:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Does Proto Lithuanian predate Proto Latvian hard to say. Though to state categorically that Proto Lithuanian is the proto langauge of all Baltic states is spurious at best. There is little difference in both these proto languages, both having evolved from the Indo European. Stub should be kept but reworded to remove unsourced and likely Original Research content. Tovian (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Baltic languages. This seems likely original research as well, and in any case if there is sourceable research on reconstructing a protolanguage ancestral to the Baltic language, our coverage in that article could use some major expansion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Our article about the Proto-Latvian language a separate article again. A redirect to Latvian language might also make sense. We already have a stub about a proto-langauge of all Baltic languages and that's Proto-Baltic language. — Kpalion(talk) 18:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Kpalion. --Visconsus (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.