Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia)

Publications of Socialist Alternative (Australia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puffery on behalf of a notable-but-not-that-notable socialist organisation listing anything various members have gotten published anywhere, much of it in dubiously reliable sources. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:42, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, this is clearly a COI job, seeking to use wiki article for promotion of a political group. The group itself isn't that notable, so a separate page for its publishing activities is not needed. --Soman (talk) 08:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Soman; surprisingly well-done, but certainly not for Wikipedia. Frickeg (talk) 04:01, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disagree this is COI, it includes criticism from the Australian Prime Minister, and the fact that their website has been a target of hacking for its unfavourable political views. Marxwasright (talk) 06:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.