Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puedes Contar Conmigo
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Puedes Contar Conmigo
- Puedes Contar Conmigo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unlikely to develop beyond a stub. Searching for the song title yields nothing to suggest it is a particulary notable song except for its #1 chart ranking in Spain and Mexico, which I can't even confirm MadCow257 (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Let me expand my research on the charting history, though I am disputing both notability and that there is "enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." (WP:NSONGS) Here is what I have found. Claim:
- 1 in Spain - I see this referenced on the internet in several places, but cannot find it on the actual chart. A song of the name but by a different band (Mägo de Oz) did chart highly on PROMUSICAE Link
- 1 in Mexico - No, because AMPROFONdoes not chart singles.
- 5 on US Billboard Latin Chart - Yes. Link MadCow257 (talk) 00:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Lo Que te Conté Mientras te Hacías la Dormida. -- Whpq (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:00, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep because of #5 position on a Billboard chart. Some coverage here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:43, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.