Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puteri Anetta Komarudin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Clear consensus that the subject passes
WP:NPOL. TheSandDoctor Talk 14:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
]
Puteri Anetta Komarudin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Puteri Anetta Komarudin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per
WP:NPOL, Notability is assumed when either of two criterion from NPOL is satisfied, subject of article is leaning on #1 of NPOL but a before search shows she lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Even the two sources used in the article are shaky, this isn’t a reliable source & the second being this source is not even about her. GNG is definitely not satisfied here. Lastly, notability is not inherited, her father is a notable politician but it doesn’t translate to her being auto notable via proximity. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have added sources, please feel free to improve the article Germartin1 (talk) 14:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment. The article states she's a member of the WP:NPOL pass. Am I missing something here? AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 16:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)]
- @WP:GNG & in itself isn’t an SNG. Celestina007 (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)]
- @
- Keep. She’s a newly elected representative so may not have attracted much media attention yet. Unless someone thinks she isn’t actually a member of the PRC, she’s default notable. Mccapra (talk) 18:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- WP:TOOSOON scenario? Celestina007 (talk) 18:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)]
- Keep The subject easily passes WP:GNG. —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)]
- Keep Notable per WP:NPOL, I have added a source. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)]
- Keep passes WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.