Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuHarrison Terry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 13:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QuHarrison Terry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

spam from Voidz. non notable individual, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. sourcing is a mix of a blog mention and a video a performace where he happened to be playing. nothing independent or substantial. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No
evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 18:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only sources are ads for albums. This does not meet our notability standards. Joja lozzo 01:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No indication of notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 07:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.