Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum Psychology

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Default keep, a merge or redirect are possible. Tone 17:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum Psychology

Quantum Psychology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was recently prodded after having been an uncited stub for years. De-prodded, with a couple of sources added which show the existence of the book. However, a

WP:NBOOK. Onel5969 TT me 15:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's a
talk) 16:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
I have restored
talk) 21:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Support merge. Even if notable, notable in this context. Hyperbolick (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep, a major book by a major counterculture author, mentioned in Wilson's The Guardian obituary and, as cited by Pelirojopajaro above, whose comment amounts to a Keep, is well represented in Google scholar. Wilson is recognized as one of the main authors of the American and world counterculture, comparable to Timothy Leary, and all of his works are thus stand-alone notable. Quantum Psychology is also notable for being the introductory volume about the subject, and is notable as one of the few book written totally in E-Prime. Too much going for this one to delete. Randy Kryn (talk) 17:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Robert Anton Wilson. Passing mentions in both obituaries and no reviews show that NBOOK is not satisfied, but redirects are cheap. I'm not finding any use of the term with respect to quantum mysticism. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:56, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore redirect to
    ping}}) czar 19:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep notable book Lightburst (talk) 04:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.