Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. P. Patnaik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per nominator's own withdrawal. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IE: "Request speedy close as keep, as nominator. Article is no unsourced BLP any more." The Banner talk 09:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

R. P. Patnaik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced BLP The Banner talk 21:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep per
editorial attention. SCHMIDT, ^{Michael Q.} 03:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - Notable personality, popular also. Enough references from reliable sources available. Award winning personality. Article has good scope for improvement also.
Anish Viswa 04:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep – A prominent composer in Telugu cinema. Has won the "Filmfare Best Music director" for three consecutive years. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 06:09, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was created in November 2006 and as noted above did contain sources at one time. I think the nominator was concerned about
  not intended to be used to force cleanup. SCHMIDT, ^{Michael Q.} 08:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  - It is nice to see how the article is improved, as I had the idea that it was another case of puffery and selfpromo, impossible to rescue. That it turns out otherwise is a pleasant surprise. Rescuing, not to mention cleaning up, was in my opinion not possible, so don't accuse me of forcing a clean up. Assume good faith, please. The Banner talk 09:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thank you for revisting, and I am happy that that a
      WP:NOTCLEANUP as a personal affront, as I have extensive experience dealing with improvable articles sent to AFD that simply needed a little love. SCHMIDT, ^{Michael Q.} 10:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
      ]

Request speedy close as keep, as nominator. Article is no unsourced BLP any more. The Banner talk 09:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.