Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Frank (meteorologist)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 01:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rachel Frank (meteorologist)
- Rachel Frank (meteorologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local news personality whose only claim of importance appears to be a regional Emmy award; the rest of the content reads like a typical local news personality résumé with no actual indication of notability. I cannot find coverage in
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 02:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not all on-air personalities are notable enough for Wikipedia inclusion, especially ones at the local level. I don't think that the regional New England Emmy, which Frank won, is "a well-known and significant award or honor" in the grand scheme of things. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 04:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.