Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachelle Walker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keeper | 76 02:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rachelle Walker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• DJ8946 This does not need to be deleted because she is signed to WWE. She is not an active wrestler because of an injury. —Preceding undated comment added 01:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

A WWE Contract don't make you notable. When she appear in the main roser, maybe she'll be notable. Now, she isn't. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:42, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- She isn't notable. She might be in the future, but Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. She could easily quit and disappear into obscurity. Until she does something of note in WWE, she doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Feedback ^☎ 15:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not even close to notable. BerleT (talk) 04:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.