Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rademacher (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rademacher (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails

notability criteria for albums. Independent released albums are generally not notable and no source contradicts this. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 23:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:54, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per
WP:NALBUMS, doesn't appear to be covered in sources, and its just a tracklisting, so should not have it's own article (WP:NALBUMS again) Bob House 884 (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NALBUMS, given that article doesn't contain anything to otherwise demonstrate notability. Cymru82 (talk) 16:41, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.