Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railway Children

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Railway Children. El_C 19:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Railway Children

)

I'm not going to try to ascertain whether this article is original research, but it sure looks like original research. Delete unless sources can be cited. Shalom ^Hello 18:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as NN neologism and OR unless plenty of sources provided. I just searched the UK NewsBank newspaper archive (weeding out Nesbit's The Railway Children) and found no references at all to this claimed usage. Gordonofcartoon 20:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Railway Children. Corvus cornix 21:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes. That too. Gordonofcartoon 21:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c) Redirect to The Railway Children (rolling back to original version of the page). Which reminds me, if a page is created as a redirect, and an article is written in its stead that qualifies for deletion, when is it ok to just roll it back to the original, and when for AfD? Eliz81 ^(talk)^(contribs) 21:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to a redirect is just an editing question. Probably better to simply change again than to rollback. But mention on the talk page first. DGG (talk) 02:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.