Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Valley (Arizona)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Go Phightins! 16:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Valley (Arizona)

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a neighborhood in Arizona ... Google search turns up nothing that if I googled the title of the neighborhood in which I grew up would not turn up (i.e. Mapquest, Zillow, perhaps an elementary school site, etc.) ... does not meet

WP:GNG Go Phightins! 05:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. According to the USGS (25035), Rainbow Valley is a populated place, a U6 unincorporated community. There is also a valley by same name nearby. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was just reading some notability guidelines and failed to find any that seemed specifically applicable, but places are not my area of expertise, so I will defer to you—does that automatically confer notability? Go Phightins! 03:17, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a policy, but
WP:GEOLAND spells it out. Clarityfiend (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. By longstanding general consensus, populated named places are notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Populated places are considered notable as part of Wikipedia's function as a gazetteer, according to longstanding precedent. The page should be moved to
WP:USPLACE. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 09:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Nominator's note - I could not tell whether or not this qualified as a populated place and was solely judging it on GNG, which it does not meet, however if it is considered a populated place and thus meets notability consensus, would anyone object if I withdrew my nomination, closed this discussion, and moved it to Rainbow Valley, Arizona per TheCatalyst31? Go Phightins! 12:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.