Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramón Nomar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramón Nomar

Ramón Nomar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu57 04:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu57 04:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. gnu57 04:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not enough secondary sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - He was a popular performer in Spain. Unfortunately, Google News does not work on .es news sites due to Spanish law.[4] Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found these two non-trivial articles.[5][6] Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Morbidthoughts. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: sources presented do not amount to notability under
  WP:ENT. For example, This source is largely based on an interview. It starts with Nomar, who will notice that it is a poetic name (Nomar is 'Ramon' backwards) compared to the names of other actors in the genre, such as the one of the great Pop Terminator. We meet at the Zurich bar in Barcelona, ​​and when I see him (dressed) it is as if the air had the texture of cheese spread. I get dizzy. and so on. The other sources, “But What About Feminist Porn?”: Examining the Work of Tristan Taormino, appears to be about somebody else. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - Passes the GNG due to sources identified by GNU plus the two other sources I found. It is irrelevant if an article is based on an interview that a journalist did per
  significant coverage. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep: Though I'm not personally a fan of articles on pornographic actors, the subject clearly has an extensive filmography, thereby passing the
  WP:GNG (assuming the Spanish sources are reliable). In response to user:K.e.coffman's critique of the sources, I echo the thoughts of user:Morbidthoughts and add the following: the interview-like article isn't really an interview, in my opinion, but merely contains quotes, which I think is acceptable; and the "Examining the Work of Tristan Taormino" article, while not dedicated to the subject, contains a discussion of the subject which is clearly more than a mere passing mention. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep Per Morbidthoughts and Dflaw4. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the non-english sources provided above. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 07:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.