Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Lallu Vaishya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. WP:Non-admin closure. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Lallu Vaishya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG flat. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

@IndianBio: Doesn't fail, Because as per Wikipedia notability policy, an MLA is notable. This article fulfill the notability guidelines. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 19:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As an elected
WP:POLITICIAN. The article should be improved through normal editing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Members of Legislative Assembly pass
WP:POLITICIAN. Not much article content, but it is supported by its reference. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.