Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramprakash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramprakash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A disambiguation page with only two links isn't really necessary. The two pages linked also have hatnotes, which should suffice. Nerd1a4i (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep. There's one more Ramprakash (Ramprakash Mehra) and half a dozen Ram Prakashes [1] that could be added as well. – Uanfala (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding that this is not a disambiguation page, but a name article, and these are generally kept if they include at least two entries (see
  WP:APONOTE). – Uanfala (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  - Further noting that disambiguation pages with only two entries are needed if none of the articles is the
    WP:TWODABS). – Uanfala (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Now there are four entries, plus Ram Prakash. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.