Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapport congruency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 01:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rapport congruency

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flat-out incorrect. Made-up term, and unsourced because of it This is rapport, but this is unsourced and we're never going to find anything using this term because it's not real. "the tendency to form a rapport" in the lede is "rapport building", and the rest of it is some sort of psychological opinion as to why you build it. I'm going to also point out this article has been unsourced and in its present state since September of 2004. MSJapan (talk) 06:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An unreferenced and worthless little stub about a non-notable phrase used in a handful of e-book study guides. I can find no evidence of significant coverage of the phrase, which is nothing more than psychobabble. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:03, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I have found nothing better and there's also nothing else actually convincing here. Delete as there's nothing convincing from keeping this as is with no available substance. SwisterTwister talk 20:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.