Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravenstein (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. However if someone wants it to actively improve on, I'm happy to restore it to draft. Star Mississippi 02:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ravenstein (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Coverage is limited to promotional announcements of upcoming screenings in a local paper ([1]), awards published by non-notable film festivals and primary sources. Rotten Tomatoes lists no critics' reviews; searching online, I was able to find only this, which is an unreliable one-man blog. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United Kingdom. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: It could have been redirected to the director with the local source mentioned above but....the nominator just moved their page to DRAFTspace five minutes before nominating their films....so no choice, if we don't want to editwar and make this very confusing...let's DRAFTitfy this and maybe users can make one or two or three decent pages with redirects and merge of content. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even taken all together none of the sources really seem viable for writing either an article about the director or the films. The totality of coverage in independent sources across the articles is the local paper announcement and a review of another film in a maybe-reliable indie source ([2]). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, maybe, I don't know. But since you draftified the article on the director, I think we should draftify this. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per my check, I searched for reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the subject but did not find anything promising that could make this film article notable. I also searched for reviews but found only reviews from blogs and some unreliable sources, which obviously can’t make this article notable. Regarding redirecting and draftification, I would say the director’s article itself is not in the main space due to notability issues, so there’s no point in redirecting. Additionally, there is no article available on Wikipedia for any cast member from the film. I also do not support draftification because the film was released in 2020, and since then, nothing has emerged to make the article notable. Therefore, it is unlikely that anything will change in the future. The single award the film received, the ‘Los Angeles Film Awards,’ is not an exclusive or particularly notable award in my view. Therefore, notability cannot be established based on this alone. GrabUp - Talk 16:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.