Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raytheon Six Sigma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Utility rating of this article is (i^2 + 1^2) * 100%. Guy (Help!) 15:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raytheon Six Sigma

Article describes a Raytheon internal company process and is non-notable outside the company. The tone of the article is very sarcastic and appears to have been written and expanded by disgruntled employees -- and in fact, the initial article and most revisions are anonymous edits from a company IP address. Article has been flagged for lack of neutrality and supporting facts since July 2006. Engineer Bob 10:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as
WP:BOLLOCKS. The formula gives it away, as the result is always zero. MER-C 12:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom and MER-C. Pure bollocks. Ultra-Loser ^{[ T ] [ C ]} 14:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Raytheon, it is their trade mark.--Ioannes Pragensis 14:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Articles about management pseudo-philosophies or pseudo-sciences are often full of
original research. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.