Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebeca Flores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Zamora Afd was not quite technically completed and so this consensus only applies to Flores. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rebeca Flores

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susana Rivadeneira. Also bundling Ximena Zamora who was discussed in that very AFD, but not technically nominated. Geschichte (talk) 11:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one source is never enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not pass GNG. Serankail (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for spamming, likely
WP:UPE. MER-C 15:20, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete both due to GNG failure Spiderone 21:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both for reasons stated by nominator (it was my afd tagging foul up that missed Ximena Zamora) ☆ Bri (talk) 03:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.