Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Dunn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. There's some differences on the actual redirect but deletion is clear. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Dunn

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable for only a single event, poorly sourced only to a facebook post. Article created by a huge corporate sponsored effort using meat/socks. Legacypac (talk) 01:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NMODEL

Criteria: Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities:

a) Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.

b) Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.

c) Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Legacypac (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as I can't find any shred of notability so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 01:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize If I or Legacy have offended anyone with what we said .... We were simply making light-hearted jokes but in hindsight probably not a wise idea (I've decided to remove them since its best all round I think), Again sorry!, Cheers, –Davey2010^Talk 15:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I fail to see what her appearance has to do with anything, but fails
WP:NMODEL. If she wins the article can be recreated. And can we please move any discussion not related to notability elsewhere, preferably off-wiki. Valfontis (talk) 03:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 05:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Trout for the leering comments about BLP subjects. Not funny, just stupid. That said: this is one of a web of 50 (or so) stub bios for the Miss USA 2015 pageant contestants. One would think this should be a mass nomination. What is the AfD precedent on such biographies of contestants who have won no award other than the state preliminaries? Most of these are pretty much not going to be GNG passes outside of the BLP-1E wins of the preliminary competitions, don't you think? I have no further opinion about the specifics of this particular AfD nomination. Carrite (talk) 13:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:NMODEL applies. In most prior years we only had articles for the National winner (another policy on contests somewhere) but that was not a big enough link building opportunity. If/when a girl does something more notable, like becomes a notable actress, TV anchor, or Playboy model (like one I saw) then they get an article. Legacypac (talk) 16:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Redirect to Miss USA 2015; plausible search term but winning a state beauty pageant is not in itself notable. Note that there is a mass AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Guthrie as well. Tarc (talk) 15:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect per the same rationale I gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Guthrie. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Not notable outside of
one event --Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Redirect there are a number of articles that have been created for the
Kimberly Agron ought to redirect to Miss Alaska USA etc. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.