Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recipe for Love
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence provided by the sole keep argument to justify this film's inclusion. ✗plicit 03:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Recipe for Love
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Recipe for Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage or other indications of notability per
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Seems to have the usual minimal coverage for a Hallmark Channel movie, e.g. small news bites. This was the best I could quickly find: [1]. Most references to the film seem to center on Danielle Panabaker, who is better known for other work. Suriname0 (talk) 18:43, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:35, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As a non-notable film. Meanwhile, maybe it could briefly be mentioned in the Danielle Panabaker article if it isn't already. Since that's who most of the coverage for it seems to revolve around. I don't think it's worth a merge or redirect though. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Is a relevant tv film. Bradford (Talk) 22:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MILL. What is more formulaic, clichéd, and run of the mill than a Hallmark film? Bearian (talk) 20:38, 15 July 2021 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.