Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RefRef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be recreated if the subject becomes notable due to coverage in reliable sources. Sandstein 06:28, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RefRef

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another user was trying to nominate this but it kept misfiring for some reason. Anyway, not-notable software, still in development, no sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Any assertion of future notability of this program is a case of
bot!) 07:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep or merge: This is software made by
talk • contribs) 10:40, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was the one who tried to list nominate this. I agree completely with the reasoning of Jethrobot MadCow257 (talk) 21:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.