Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remixes (Arthur Loves Plastic album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:40, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remixes (Arthur Loves Plastic album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating a group of remix albums by the one artist. They lack coverage in independent reliable sources. Lack reviews, charting, awards. Nothing coming close to

WP:NALBUMS

. Just a bunch on bad external links trying to publicise the album. The only references are the artist own site, internet archive, garageband. None independent reliable sources. The external links are just linkspam. Others nominated are:

)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, | Uncle Milty | talk | 17:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. At random I plugged in

Now 83 and find that every album in the Now Series has not only a page (judging by the navbox) but presumably a redirect or two. These are basically list articles which sometimes have a lead that says it topped the compilation charts, otherwise just the date of publication and a track listing. Many are marked for lack of sources. Are they, in itself, notable? The individual songs are, at face value, notable, and the series itself is probably notable, but are compilations/remixes de facto notable? I presume so, but fail to see how: we'd end up listing every (issue of every) chart and every entry on it, by their mutual assertions of notability. Which I imagine, alas, is the case. Si Trew (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I appreciate list articles don't have to be notable in themselves. But these articles, which are list articles, don't claim to be, so should stand on their own feet. Most of the "Now That's What I Call Music" articles should go, too. Si Trew (talk) 01:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.