Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renaissance Capital (US company) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Renaissance Capital (US company)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Full disclosure, I found this article because it was posted to the #wikipedia-en irc for possible promotional issues.

Pretty much the whole article is promotional and I could not find any significant coverage. The funds they manage are LISTED, but the company seems not to be, and notability is not inherited. There was a significant expansion of the article concurrent with the previous AfD in 2012, but I do not believe it meets our current standards, even if it was enough for a "no consensus" then: Of the sources considered then, the BusinessWeek article is now a 404 I can't find an archived copy of, the LA Times article appears to be a reprint of a press release submitted to Bloomberg News, and the review in Stocks and Commodities possibly meets the criteria—if there are similar sources, we should consider refocusing the article on that particular product.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:46, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also note that some of the employees of Renaissance might be presumed notable under supplementary criteria of NBIO for being highly influential, but there is not an equivalent for companies I'm aware of. Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very promotional likely non notable 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.
HighKing⁺⁺ 11:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.