Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reservations (website)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reservations (website)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. References are largely press releases or not written independently from the subject. Lacks significant coverage to assert notability. — ξ ^xplicit 01:46, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 01:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not seeing evidence or even suggestion that this rises to the level of encyclopedic/notable., and it reads as if it were the site's own "About Us" page. --Calton | Talk 02:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Available coverage consists mostly of press releases, and so the site fails
WP:GNG. /wiae /tlk 03:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: An article on an intermediating company website, with content and references predominantly primary or routine announcements of the partnership deals inherent to that kind of business. No
company. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.