Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Residents' Association of London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Residents' Association of London

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties. Article only has citations which prove the party existed, not that the party satisfies GNG or ORG guidelines. A place on the Register of Political Parties is not enough to prove achievement or importance, and usefulness is not a valid reason to retain. doktorb _words^deeds 20:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 20:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 20:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 20:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agreed with the nominator's assessment. There is nowhere near the coverage required to meet NCORP for this minor political party, who primarily stood unelected candidates at the local level and received little coverage outside of the register. The article claims that the party split from Havering Residents Association, but I found no evidence of that in online sources. Unless those could be found, a merge / redirect to Havering Residents Association is not appropriate either. -- Dps04 (talk) 07:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: seems to be a minor political party that has had no real success, no apparent coverage to meet
WP:GNG Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.