Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resolution (Lamb of God album)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. The consensus below is that sufficient sources already exist to support an article even before the formal release of the album. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolution (Lamb of God album)
- Resolution (Lamb of God album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Crystal balling on an album that is scheduled to be released next year, based on one source from a less than fully reliable source. Dennis Brown (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note There are a lot of albums from this band that have popped up recently from the same contributor (obviously in good faith, but the criteria isn't AGF), and I'm not so sure any of them (or the band) passes wp:music. It would be swell if someone who works in that area regularly to look at it, as they would be a better judge than I. The issue with this article/album are more clear. Dennis Brown (talk) 12:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The band is def. notable (the article is a GA, for one). I suspect this album will be notable too. The nominator says "next year", which is true, albeit only it's only January 24. Lugnuts (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh and Keep, based on the sources I found and added in about 1 minute. Lugnuts (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem with "I suspect this album will be notable too" is WP:CRYSTALBALL, without sources. As for the other albums, if they have their own article, EACH album has to establish notability on its own, it isn't inherited. Again, I don't know everything about wp:music, but general notability makes that clear, that is why I was asking for someone who deals with wp:music to review all the new album additions, which don't seem to provide notability info. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem with "I suspect this album will be notable too" is
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – I was able to find a handful of sources about Resolution, including Exclaim![1], Noisecreep[2] and a full-page article in the latest issue of Rock Sound[3]. Fezmar9 (talk) 06:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are enough sources to pass the notability guideline for albums. Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 19:59, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.