Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restricted Access Barrier System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, improper nomination, no summary in nomination of attempts to find sources and sources now found. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restricted Access Barrier System

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

• Keep - technically speaking, I created the article, but it was the result of a split at RABS and I really don't have anything to do with the article content. The topic does appear the notable in the pharma and food industries. This article] is specifically about it. There is some mention of it in this book. In the alternative, it might be worth a merge to contamination control. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Nomination fails
  WP:NOEFFORT. Colonel Warden (talk) 14:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Based on the work the creator did, the nomination is inaccurate. It is in fact verifiable, it just wasn't verified at the time of the nomination which is something completely different. Nomination clearly fails
  WP:BEFORE. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. I have renamed it to restricted-access barrier system as the main reference seems to be doing. JFW | T@lk 10:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.