Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Wealth
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 00:08, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Revolutionary Wealth
- Revolutionary Wealth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable book; does not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (books). ZimZalaBim talk 22:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Book written by the book notability guideline's keep rules. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment which certain age would that be ? I've never heard of him :-) CultureDrone (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Future Shock appeared in 1970. Just about everybody I went to college with was reading it at the time. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Google News comes up with extensive coverage including reviews in ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.